To paraphrase Francesca Albanese: "October 7 was an opportunity for the Israelis to complete their evil plans and projects, and Hamas isn't at fault for the massacres—antisemites or not, whatever—since they are 'dispossessed,' so the Jews had it coming."
The average age of the Hamas murderers who invaded Israel was about 20. Few had even seen a Jew. They were unborn or toddlers when Israel left Gaza, and they were dispossessed of nothing. Some of their great-grandparents had been—because they believed the lies of the Egyptians in 1948 about how they would soon push all the Jews into the sea (that 'catastrophe' of a failure to commit a genocide they call the 'Nakhba')—but they had been no more or less dispossessed than the Holocaust survivors or elderly North African Jews who they slaughtered at random.
Am I—a fourth-generation descendant of people dispossessed of their homes in Warsaw before being killed at Auschwitz—within my rights to raise a militia and start butchering and pillaging my way across Germany and Poland? Does my "dispossession" also entitle me to murder the great-grandchildren of SS men in their beds in Hamburg? Does the same apply to the hundreds of millions of distant offspring of Indians, Pakistanis, Greeks, Armenians, Turks, and Poles who were uprooted by war in the 20th century? Do they get to spill the blood of the descendants of their ancestors' rivals? Is land really more precious than life? Is this the kind of zombie apocalypse the UN was set up for?
Albanese was no impartial observer on October 7; she is part of the reason the Hamas fighters believed their evil was justified due to their "dispossession." For years, she worked at UNRWA, a body charged with perpetuating the conflict by telling the great-grandchildren of refugees that they must liberate the land by blood—their own and that of the Jews.
People say that UNRWA is a Hamas front, but this isn’t accurate. Hamas is the military wing of UNRWA—it is the UNRWA textbooks and Albanese-style propaganda made manifest.
Share this post